Decija knjizevnost_obavestenje

Spisak pregledanih seminarski radova, za sada:

Balažević Josip 10  
Čanković Mina 7  
Dragoslavić Ana Vracen  
Đukanović Branislava Vracen  
FečkeŠ Martina 7  
Jovović Olja 8  
Kovačević Jovana 8,5  
Maksić Ivana 9  
Narančić Violeta 8  
Pavlica Goran Vracen  
Stojaković Sanja 9  
Teodorović Slađana 7,5  

Javila je prof. Felbabov da ljudi kojima su vraceni seminarski radovi mogu da ih uzmu u sobi 74/II kod sekretarice Odseka. Potrebno je da ih prerade da bi mogli da izadju na ispit 25. januara.
Njena e-mail adresa je vfelb@eunet.yu pa je mozete kontaktirati.
Uskoro ce stici i rezultati za ostale seminarske radove.

Serbian and English in Contact_rezultati

Rezultati Testa 1 i Testa 2.
Ostale informacije su na oglasnoj tabli.



Group A
1. Aćimović, Igor 91 78
2. Balažević, Josip 98 87
3. Boškić, Marina 62
4. Brdar, Sanja 53 72
5. Damjanovski, Jovana 84 79
6. Drljača, Borko 91 93
7. Glavaš, Aleksandra 65 70
8. Gligorić, Snežana 74
9. Jakovljević, Nemanja 74 81
10.Jovanović, Kristina 95 92
11.Jovović, Olja 75 95
12.Juhas, Branislava 80 78
13.Knežević, Sandra 83 84
14.Kostić, Aleksandar 82 88
15.Kovačević, Jovana 68 57
16.Kukulj, Bojana 91 77
17.Kurtišević, Edina 82 91
18.Ljuba, Maja 85 91
19.Malinov, Ana 74 74
20.Marjanović, Tamara 85 84
21.Milanović, Dunja 68 82
22.Milenković, Radmila 71 81
23.Milićević, Tamara 79 86
24.Milosavljević, Tatjana 94 93
25.Mladenović, Katarina 82 77
26.Mustapić, Katarina 79 82
27.Nikolić, Milana 85 85
28.Obradović, Milan 77 87
29.Pavlović, Danica 50 67
30.Penić, Jasmina
31.Ribić, Radomir 60
32.Stanimirović, Sanja 85 96
33.Šijački, Miloš 60 82
34.Škrbić, Dragana 77 92
35.Umičević, Dejan 84
36.Varagić, Tijana 81 86
37.Vilotić, Branko 85 87


Group B
1. Aleksić, Uroš 68 89
2. Antunović, Ksenija 77 93
3. Babić, Jelena 76 86
4. Budalić, Vladimir 91
5. Cvetić, Milana 71 87
6. Čarubrić, Slobodan 94 83
7. Despotović, Slavko 88 85
8. Dimitrijević, Jovana 83 83
9. Dragičević, Tomislava 94 87
10. Dragoslavić, Ana 100 86
11. Džunja, Ivana 76 83
12. El Farra, Hana 94 85
13. Erdes, Edit 94 83
14. Eremić, Kristina 83 77
15. Fečkeš, Martina 77 86
16. Gajdoš, Srđan 82 90
17. Gal, Ana Marija 82 82
18. Ilić, Stefan 88 83
19. Kovač, Ivana 88 76
20. Kovačević, Dajana 100 89
21. Milanović, Miloš 88 98
22. Perišić, Ana 77 87
23. Plavšić, Jelena 85 91
24. Radmanović, Vladimir 88 91
25. Spevak, Vincent 94 66
26. Stanču, Stefania 88 85
27. Stanojević, Tamara 88 75
28. Teodorović, Slađana 76 72
29. Tomić, Nataša 82 93
30. Trkulja, Milan 94 95
31. Ursulović, Nataša 91 82
32. Vukosavljević, Jelena 83 84



The make up test for
Serbian and English in Contact will be
Jan. 15, 2009
at 5 p.m.
in 25/II.

The make up test for
Translating Literary Texts into English will be
Jan. 16, 2009
at 11 a.m.
in 25/II.

Decija knjizevnost_seminarski

Zamolila me Sladja da postavim ovde molbu da posaljete svoje seminarske svima koji idu na kurs, zbog tema za ispit.

Decija knjizevnost

Rok za predaju seminarskih je danas u 12h u kabinetu 74.

NJV_writing #2 info

Writing Assignment #2 for Elizabeth's NJV III students:

Coursebook, p. 65, Task 9, Formal Letter
Read pp. 63-65 to review the requirements for a formal letter.
Write a formal letter in answer to the task. Organize the letter in four paragraphs:

Paragraph 1: reason for writing
Paragraph 2: clarification of situation
Paragraph 3: further details if necessary
Paragraph 4: any requests for action or information

I will be in my office (67/II) to collect your assignments on Monday, January 26 from 11.00-13.00 or you can email them to me at lizsalmore@gmail.com.








ps. Rezultata jos nema, okacicu cim mi bude poslala...

krediti i stipendije

http://www.ubbad.rs/3.asp

:)

NJV rezultati...

...ce biti do kraja godine, tako rekla Elizabeth danas, tako da eto... Rekla je da ce poslati i rezultete testa i listening-a zajedno valjda, pa cu ih okaciti kako ih posalje i kad ih posalje...
I, da, rekla je i da ce poslati writing assignment #2 za grupu od utorka, posto nije prosli utorak rekla sta treba da radimo...

... :)

Savremeni roman - kolokvijum II

To whom it may concern
Drugi (i poslednji) kolokvijum iz Savremenog britanskog romana odrzace se naredne godine, i to 14. januara u 14h u ucionici 26/I. Dobro dosli.
Sto se konsultacija tice, i njih ce biti naredne godine, i to 14. januara, u terminu od 13h, u kabinetu 62/II. I na njih dobro dosli. U medjuvremenu, sva pitanja uputiti mejlom.
Nina

Akademsko_help for assignment 3

• Write an article for publication in an Internet magazine on one argument topic.
• The article should be discursive - it should discuss the claim, support, warrants and backing.
• Include all six parts of Toulmin's argument analysis, putting the main claim at the start of the article.
• Use four pieces of support (or more if liked), but also give rebuttal for each item of that support; this will make the article balanced, rather than one-sided.
• Since warrants link support with main claim, separate warrants may be needed for each item of support. Alternatively, a "universal" warrant could apply to all four pieces of support.
• Ensure the writing flows, is logically ordered (order support from weakest to strongest or vice versa) and makes sense.
• If preferred, structure the argument so that it does not agree with the claim as given in class.
• Do include your own opinion on the claim.
• Do not use the personal pronouns I or we in the argument - the register will be very formal.
• Use your own ideas and support - citations of other people's ideas, work or opinions are not necessary.
• A properly discursive argument should be between one and two pages, although slightly less or slightly more could be acceptable.
• Plagiarising is not acceptable.
• Include an eye-catching title, your name and index number as a header (all in italics and centred).

Akademsko_info za article

Warrant: this links the main claim with the support (if you have this warrant); or
make the support data to be unsuitable in favour of the claim (if you don't hold them).

For your analysis, sort out your support first.

Once you have that, try to determine if there is a "universal" warrant that will enable you to link all pieces of support with your main claim (this may or may not be possible, as it depends on exactly what support you consider to be important enough to write about). It may be that each piece of support requires a different warrant.


Sport hunting: More support in favour:
1. In England, for example, people who hunt are involved first-hand with the continuance of their cultural heritage, with its own customs and important traditions, handed down from generation to generation.
2. The philosophical point that Man is a special case among animals, because of our intelligence - this gives us rights which other animals don't have.
3. The Christian point of view that we have dominion over animals.


How many pieces of support are necessary?
Try to include at least four. Use open questions to find support. Once you have your support and warrants sorted out, then think about the last three parts of Toulmin's Argument Theory, and include them. Rebut, by dismissing with reason the support you provide, or attacking the warrant(s).

Remember, rebuttal is not just saying "but I disagree with that", but rather involves logical and hopefully concrete reasoning.


Order
As always, think about the order you present your argument. You can start with what seems the most important support, and work down to the least important, or vice versa. You can present all your support for one point of view, then all the arguments against those pieces of support. You can deal with both aspects of one piece of support at a time (first support positive, first support negative; second support positive, second support negative etc)